 |
 |


 |
 |
 |
 |


During a speech Odd Nerdrum held at a press
conference at the opening of the exhibition ”Odd Nerdrum- Paintings 1978 –
1998” in Astrup Fearnley Museeum, Oslo 24.09.98, Nerdrum made history and
said:” Kitsch is about timeless and eternally human issues and problems,
the pathetic regardless form – what we call: the humanum.
Kitsch serves life, and seeks the individual in contrast to Art and its
distance “ (you can also read this speech in On Kitsch 2001. Nerdrum et
al.). “ In Kitsch skill is the final criteria of quality. The work of the
hand is exposing it self in the light of existing norms. Kitsch has
therefore no protection since the standard is the best works done in
history…Art serves and exist for Art itself and seeks the public
sphere…Kitsch serves life and seeks the single individual.” When a
journalist claimed that Kitsch was sofa decoration Nerdrum replied: “ It
is wrong that Kitsch only has to be sofa decoration”, and refers to the
famous essay by Hermann Broch in “Kitsch and Art” from 1930, ”because then
would Wagner and Tsjakovskij had to disappear, but Broch emphasize them as
great Kitsch, since they operate with great drama and complicated things
which is beautiful performed. This is the doubleness of Kitsch on a higher
level”.
Odd Nerdrums definition on Kitsch has following values: craft, the single
individual and human emotions. The evaluation of its theme and timeless
styles complexity is the possibility of grading Kitsch in high or low
Kitsch. This is quite different from our low trash associations with
Kitsch today (This separation between high and low mass arts is currently
worked on by Skurdal on her degree in Master of Social Science).
If the reader thinks back on Nerdrums biography and his position in the
Norwegian Art World, you can easy grasp his character with the help from
Hermann Broch (1930) when he (Broch) from his platonic – Kantian angel
labels the kitsch producer in this words:”The producer of kitsch is not
one who produce inferior Art, or a person that has no abilities. You can
absolutely not measure him out of an aesthetic standard, because he is an
ethic disgusting person, a criminal that wants the radical evil: He is a
pig “(Broch, Hermann).
When Broch writes (and speaks) from the Platonic and Kantian angel and
describes the ethical evil agent from that angel, is it in that terms
Broch has its value system. Plato and Kant are his values, and that
represent the good value system. In other words: Art is the ethical good.
In this Kitsch Forum we see things from the opposite angel: namely from
the Aristotelian and Randian. This angel represents according to Broch the
evil. I believe and have Nerdrum with me when I claim that it is his
systems of values which are evil, and I have scientific thesis that will
prove this philosophically, sociologically and historically (In current
scientific work by Skurdal 2005).
The good value system is the State – collectivism and altruism, and with
Hegel’s Zeitgeist as its leading star. The artist as an agent – the
ethical good – creates what themselves claim is morally good (since the
curatoriat claims that from them), while the ethical evil and disgust
seize the object and reproduce its natural beauty with high techniqual
abilities. Kitsch creates the humanum in the most living and timeless
form.
The Kitsch producer learns technique abilities from the old masters of the
past, just as what Nerdrum has done. Hard work, a big talent, abilities
and the wish and longing for the old masters, and not the modern- “the so
called original” is why Broch scream as a pietistic disciple that a kitsch
producer is a pig. Kitsch is not following institutional norms and rules.
Art and the good Kantian moral as its partner and friend, and as Kant
himself put it: the dominating ideas have always right, and your duty as
your ticket to freedom is to follow this dominating moral codex result in
this: “Don’t dear to stick your neck out”.
That’s why modern Art look the same.
Since Kitsch has its basis in the past – with its timeless techniques it
is viewed as “the great evil” with reference and contrast to the Arts and
its l’art pour l’art. The good is Art, and Kitsch is bad.
The reality which the audience gaze in the Kitsch painting is: Direct to
the truth and beauty. A is A. The beauty is the empathically understanding
of the human being, simultaneous as the concretization of the metaphysical
evaluations of values in the motives opens for individual experience
through our – the audience- senses. We reach the truth objectively. Kitsch
respects the human principle that A is A, and that our faculty of reason
is never silent.
Kitsch satisfies the individual because Kitsch acknowledges its existence.
With truth as a reference too truth as a criterion in motives and themes,
is useless in Kitsch. Kitsch is a “styled” story about reality. Kitsch –
the metaphysical (value evaluations) and epistemologically (psycho –
epistemology) principles are based on…”one external reality which is
objective, and which reproduce itself when the audience integrate the
timeless craft (man/woman) ship.
The theme is styled - “romantically”- since everyone should have the
opportunity to use their own imagination that gives them an individual
joyride of Kitsch mentality.
This experience of Kitsch mentality is experienced at its most living when
it on its highest level seizes you with drama and emotions. The audience
is as Nerdrum puts it: “The people who freely choose outside the time
dimension…”
We - the audience - can with our own eyes
and independent faculty of judgment grasps what is painted since the old
master technique is the carrier of meaning and gives us an understanding
of the content in question. That process results in personal feelings
based on different individual experiences.
This article are based on Hanna Cecilie Skurdals revolutionary articles
that was printed in the Norwegian Philosophical review “AerA” nr 1 and 4
2002. Click here to
request order information by email.
Skurdal is currently (2005) working on a scientific masterpiece with
Nerdrum that explores all of her thesis in theory and practice.
|
 |
 |